MySQL千萬數據量深分頁優(yōu)化流程(拒絕線上故障)
引言
優(yōu)化項目代碼過程中發(fā)現一個千萬級數據深分頁問題,緣由是這樣的
庫里有一張耗材 MCS_PROD 表,通過同步外部數據中臺多維度數據,在系統(tǒng)內部組裝為單一耗材產品,最終同步到 ES 搜索引擎
MySQL 同步 ES 流程如下:
- 通過定時任務的形式觸發(fā)同步,比如間隔半天或一天的時間頻率
- 同步的形式為增量同步,根據更新時間的機制,比如第一次同步查詢 >= 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0
- 記錄最大的更新時間進行存儲,下次更新同步以此為條件
- 以分頁的形式獲取數據,當前頁數量加一,循環(huán)到最后一頁
在這里問題也就出現了,MySQL 查詢分頁 OFFSET 越深入,性能越差,初步估計線上 MCS_PROD 表中記錄在 1000w 左右
如果按照每頁 10 條,OFFSET 值會拖垮查詢性能,進而形成一個 "性能深淵"
同步類代碼針對此問題有兩種優(yōu)化方式:
- 采用游標、流式方案進行優(yōu)化
- 優(yōu)化深分頁性能,文章圍繞這個題目展開
軟硬件說明
MySQL VERSION
mysql>?select?version(); +-----------+ |?version()?| +-----------+ |?5.7.30????| +-----------+ 1?row?in?set?(0.01?sec)
表結構說明
借鑒公司表結構,字段、長度以及名稱均已刪減
mysql>?DESC?MCS_PROD; +-----------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ |?Field?????????????????|?Type?????????|?Null?|?Key?|?Default?|?Extra??????????| +-----------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ |?MCS_PROD_ID???????????|?int(11)??????|?NO???|?PRI?|?NULL????|?auto_increment?| |?MCS_CODE??????????????|?varchar(100)?|?YES??|?????|?????????|????????????????| |?MCS_NAME??????????????|?varchar(500)?|?YES??|?????|?????????|????????????????| |?UPDT_TIME?????????????|?datetime?????|?NO???|?MUL?|?NULL????|????????????????| +-----------------------+--------------+------+-----+---------+----------------+ 4?rows?in?set?(0.01?sec)
通過測試同學幫忙造了 500w 左右數據量
mysql>?SELECT?COUNT(*)?FROM?MCS_PROD; +----------+ |?count(*)?| +----------+ |??5100000?| +----------+ 1?row?in?set?(1.43?sec)
SQL 語句如下
因為功能需要滿足 增量拉取的方式,所以會有數據更新時間的條件查詢,以及相關 查詢排序(此處有坑)
SELECT ?MCS_PROD_ID, ?MCS_CODE, ?MCS_NAME, ?UPDT_TIME FROM ?MCS_PROD WHERE ?UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0'?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME LIMIT?xx,?xx
重新認識 MySQL 分頁
LIMIT 子句可以被用于強制 SELECT 語句返回指定的記錄數。LIMIT 接收一個或兩個數字參數,參數必須是一個整數常量
如果給定兩個參數,第一個參數指定第一個返回記錄行的偏移量,第二個參數指定返回記錄行的最大數
舉個簡單的例子,分析下 SQL 查詢過程,掌握深分頁性能為什么差
mysql>?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?(UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0')?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?100000,?1; +-------------+-------------------------+------------------+---------------------+ |?MCS_PROD_ID?|?MCS_CODE????????????????|?MCS_NAME?????????|?UPDT_TIME???????????| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------+---------------------+ |??????181789?|?XA601709733186213015031?|?尺、橈骨LC-DCP骨板?|?2020-10-19?16:22:19?| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------+---------------------+ 1?row?in?set?(3.66?sec) mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?(UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0')?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?100000,?1; +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table????|?partitions?|?type??|?possible_keys?|?key????????|?key_len?|?ref??|?rows????|?filtered?|?Extra?????????????????| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ |??1?|?SIMPLE??????|?MCS_PROD?|?NULL???????|?range?|?MCS_PROD_1????|?MCS_PROD_1?|?5???????|?NULL?|?2296653?|???100.00?|?Using?index?condition?| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ 1?row?in?set,?1?warning?(0.01?sec)
簡單說明下上面 SQL 執(zhí)行過程:
- 首先查詢了表 MCS_PROD,進行過濾 UPDT_TIME 條件,查詢出展示列(涉及回表操作)進行排序以及 LIMIT
- LIMIT 100000, 1 的意思是掃描滿足條件的 100001 行,然后扔掉前 100000 行
MySQL 耗費了 大量隨機 I/O 在回表查詢聚簇索引的數據上,而這 100000 次隨機 I/O 查詢數據不會出現在結果集中
如果系統(tǒng)并發(fā)量稍微高一點,每次查詢掃描超過 100000 行,性能肯定堪憂,另外 LIMIT 分頁 OFFSET 越深,性能越差(多次強調)

圖1 數據僅供參考
深分頁優(yōu)化
關于 MySQL 深分頁優(yōu)化常見的大概有以下三種策略:
- 子查詢優(yōu)化
- 延遲關聯
- 書簽記錄
上面三點都能大大的提升查詢效率,核心思想就是讓 MySQL 盡可能掃描更少的頁面,獲取需要訪問的記錄后再根據關聯列回原表查詢所需要的列
子查詢優(yōu)化
子查詢深分頁優(yōu)化語句如下:
mysql>?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?MCS_PROD_ID?>=?(?SELECT?m1.MCS_PROD_ID?FROM?MCS_PROD?m1?WHERE?m1.UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0'?ORDER?BY?m1.UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?3000000,?1)?LIMIT?1; +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ |?MCS_PROD_ID?|?MCS_CODE????????????????|?MCS_NAME???????????????| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ |?????3021401?|?XA892010009391491861476?|?金屬解剖型接骨板T型接骨板A?| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ 1?row?in?set?(0.76?sec) mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?MCS_PROD_ID?>=?(?SELECT?m1.MCS_PROD_ID?FROM?MCS_PROD?m1?WHERE?m1.UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0'?ORDER?BY?m1.UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?3000000,?1)?LIMIT?1; +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table????|?partitions?|?type??|?possible_keys?|?key????????|?key_len?|?ref??|?rows????|?filtered?|?Extra????????????????????| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ |??1?|?PRIMARY?????|?MCS_PROD?|?NULL???????|?range?|?PRIMARY???????|?PRIMARY????|?4???????|?NULL?|?2296653?|???100.00?|?Using?where??????????????| |??2?|?SUBQUERY????|?m1???????|?NULL???????|?range?|?MCS_PROD_1????|?MCS_PROD_1?|?5???????|?NULL?|?2296653?|???100.00?|?Using?where;?Using?index?| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ 2?rows?in?set,?1?warning?(0.77?sec)
根據執(zhí)行計劃得知,子查詢 table m1 查詢是用到了索引。首先在 索引上拿到了聚集索引的主鍵 ID 省去了回表操作,然后第二查詢直接根據第一個查詢的 ID 往后再去查 10 個就可以了

圖2 數據僅供參考
延遲關聯
"延遲關聯" 深分頁優(yōu)化語句如下:
mysql>?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?INNER?JOIN?(SELECT?m1.MCS_PROD_ID?FROM?MCS_PROD?m1?WHERE?m1.UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0'?ORDER?BY?m1.UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?3000000,?1)?AS??MCS_PROD2?USING(MCS_PROD_ID); +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ |?MCS_PROD_ID?|?MCS_CODE????????????????|?MCS_NAME???????????????| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ |?????3021401?|?XA892010009391491861476?|?金屬解剖型接骨板T型接骨板A?| +-------------+-------------------------+------------------------+ 1?row?in?set?(0.75?sec) mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?INNER?JOIN?(SELECT?m1.MCS_PROD_ID?FROM?MCS_PROD?m1?WHERE?m1.UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0'?ORDER?BY?m1.UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?3000000,?1)?AS??MCS_PROD2?USING(MCS_PROD_ID); +----+-------------+------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+-----------------------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table??????|?partitions?|?type???|?possible_keys?|?key????????|?key_len?|?ref???????????????????|?rows????|?filtered?|?Extra????????????????????| +----+-------------+------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+-----------------------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ |??1?|?PRIMARY?????|?<derived2>?|?NULL???????|?ALL????|?NULL??????????|?NULL???????|?NULL????|?NULL??????????????????|?2296653?|???100.00?|?NULL?????????????????????| |??1?|?PRIMARY?????|?MCS_PROD???|?NULL???????|?eq_ref?|?PRIMARY???????|?PRIMARY????|?4???????|?MCS_PROD2.MCS_PROD_ID?|???????1?|???100.00?|?NULL?????????????????????| |??2?|?DERIVED?????|?m1?????????|?NULL???????|?range??|?MCS_PROD_1????|?MCS_PROD_1?|?5???????|?NULL??????????????????|?2296653?|???100.00?|?Using?where;?Using?index?| +----+-------------+------------+------------+--------+---------------+------------+---------+-----------------------+---------+----------+--------------------------+ 3?rows?in?set,?1?warning?(0.00?sec)
思路以及性能與子查詢優(yōu)化一致,只不過采用了 JOIN 的形式執(zhí)行
書簽記錄
關于 LIMIT 深分頁問題,核心在于 OFFSET 值,它會 導致 MySQL 掃描大量不需要的記錄行然后拋棄掉
我們可以先使用書簽 記錄獲取上次取數據的位置,下次就可以直接從該位置開始掃描,這樣可以 避免使用 OFFEST
假設需要查詢 3000000 行數據后的第 1 條記錄,查詢可以這么寫
mysql>?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?MCS_PROD_ID?<?3000000?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?1; +-------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+ |?MCS_PROD_ID?|?MCS_CODE????????????????|?MCS_NAME????????????????????????| +-------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+ |?????????127?|?XA683240878449276581799?|?股骨近端-1螺紋孔鎖定板(純鈦)YJBL01?| +-------------+-------------------------+---------------------------------+ 1?row?in?set?(0.00?sec) mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?MCS_PROD_ID?<?3000000?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?1; +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table????|?partitions?|?type??|?possible_keys?|?key????????|?key_len?|?ref??|?rows?|?filtered?|?Extra???????| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+ |??1?|?SIMPLE??????|?MCS_PROD?|?NULL???????|?index?|?PRIMARY???????|?MCS_PROD_1?|?5???????|?NULL?|????2?|????50.00?|?Using?where?| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+------+----------+-------------+ 1?row?in?set,?1?warning?(0.00?sec)
好處是很明顯的,查詢速度超級快,性能都會穩(wěn)定在毫秒級,從性能上考慮碾壓其它方式
不過這種方式局限性也比較大,需要一種類似連續(xù)自增的字段,以及業(yè)務所能包容的連續(xù)概念,視情況而定

上圖是阿里云 OSS Bucket 桶內文件列表,大膽猜測是不是可以采用書簽記錄的形式完成
ORDER BY 巨坑, 慎踩
以下言論可能會打破你對 order by 所有 美好 YY
先說結論吧,當 LIMIT OFFSET 過深時,會使 ORDER BY 普通索引失效(聯合、唯一這些索引沒有測試)
mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME,UPDT_TIME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?(UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0')?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?100000,?1; +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table????|?partitions?|?type??|?possible_keys?|?key????????|?key_len?|?ref??|?rows????|?filtered?|?Extra?????????????????| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ |??1?|?SIMPLE??????|?MCS_PROD?|?NULL???????|?range?|?MCS_PROD_1????|?MCS_PROD_1?|?5???????|?NULL?|?2296653?|???100.00?|?Using?index?condition?| +----+-------------+----------+------------+-------+---------------+------------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------+ 1?row?in?set,?1?warning?(0.00?sec)
先來說一下這個 ORDER BY 執(zhí)行過程:
- 初始化 SORT_BUFFER,放入 MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME,UPDT_TIME 四個字段
- 從索引 UPDT_TIME 找到滿足條件的主鍵 ID,回表查詢出四個字段值存入 SORT_BUFFER
- 從索引處繼續(xù)查詢滿足 UPDT_TIME 條件記錄,繼續(xù)執(zhí)行步驟 2
- 對 SORT_BUFFER 中的數據按照 UPDT_TIME 排序
- 排序成功后取出符合 LIMIT 條件的記錄返回客戶端
按照 UPDT_TIME 排序可能在內存中完成,也可能需要使用外部排序,取決于排序所需的內存和參數 SORT_BUFFER_SIZE
SORT_BUFFER_SIZE 是 MySQL 為排序開辟的內存。如果排序數據量小于 SORT_BUFFER_SIZE,排序會在內存中完成。如果數據量過大,內存放不下,則會利用磁盤臨時文件排序
針對 SORT_BUFFER_SIZE 這個參數在網上查詢到有用資料比較少,大家如果測試過程中存在問題,可以加微信一起溝通
ORDER BY 索引失效舉例
OFFSET 100000 時,通過 key Extra 得知,沒有使用磁盤臨時文件排序,這個時候把 OFFSET 調整到 500000
涼涼夜色為你思念成河,化作春泥呵護著你... 一首涼涼送給寫這個 SQL 的同學,發(fā)現了 Using filesort
mysql>?EXPLAIN?SELECT?MCS_PROD_ID,MCS_CODE,MCS_NAME,UPDT_TIME?FROM?MCS_PROD?WHERE?(UPDT_TIME?>=?'1970-01-01?00:00:00.0')?ORDER?BY?UPDT_TIME?LIMIT?500000,?1; +----+-------------+----------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------------+ |?id?|?select_type?|?table????|?partitions?|?type?|?possible_keys?|?key??|?key_len?|?ref??|?rows????|?filtered?|?Extra???????????????????????| +----+-------------+----------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------------+ |??1?|?SIMPLE??????|?MCS_PROD?|?NULL???????|?ALL??|?MCS_PROD_1????|?NULL?|?NULL????|?NULL?|?4593306?|????50.00?|?Using?where;?Using?filesort?| +----+-------------+----------+------------+------+---------------+------+---------+------+---------+----------+-----------------------------+ 1?row?in?set,?1?warning?(0.00?sec)
Using filesort 表示在索引之外,需要額外進行外部的排序動作,性能必將受到嚴重影響
所以我們應該 結合相對應的業(yè)務邏輯避免常規(guī) LIMIT OFFSET,采用 # 深分頁優(yōu)化 章節(jié)進行修改對應業(yè)務
結言
最后有一點需要聲明下,MySQL 本身并不適合單表大數據量業(yè)務
因為 MySQL 應用在企業(yè)級項目時,針對庫表查詢并非簡單的條件,可能會有更復雜的聯合查詢,亦或者是大數據量時存在頻繁新增或更新操作,維護索引或者數據 ACID 特性上必然存在性能犧牲
如果設計初期能夠預料到庫表的數據增長,理應構思合理的重構優(yōu)化方式,比如 ES 配合查詢、分庫分表、TiDB 等解決方式
以上就是MySQL千萬數據量深分頁優(yōu)化拒絕線上故障的詳細內容,更多關于MySQL千萬數據深分頁優(yōu)化的資料請關注腳本之家其它相關文章!
相關文章
解決遠程連接MySQL報錯:2003 - Can‘t connect to&nb
這篇文章主要給大家介紹了解決遠程連接MySQL報錯:2003 - Can‘t connect to MySQL server on ‘X.X.X.X‘ (10060 “Unknown error“)問題的方案,文中有詳細的解決步驟,需要的朋友可以參考下2023-09-09

